Group of anonymous lawyers · Preliminary draft for litigation retrieval / evidence collating / instrument

A Evidence level

Datawhale FDE Case 100 | No. 3: From desk work to intelligent collaboration for litigation teams

Publisher: Datawhale FDE100 · Official case collection PDF · Direct sources at the case level

Claim origin: Disclosure by the author of the case · Independent verification: No · Accessed: 2026-09-19

Evidence level measures whether a source can be located and reviewed; it does not mean vendor-reported claims were independently audited.

Standard case | Useful reference with remaining gaps 7 / 12

Business context / 2

Transformation workflow1 / 2

Technical workflow2 / 2

Human roles & governance1 / 2

Measured outcomes1 / 2

Source traceability2 / 2

Remaining gaps: Business context, Transformation workflow, Human roles & governance, Measured outcomes

The key to this case is not the single-point use of AI, but the re-constructing of the “preliminary draft of the litigation search/evidence/instruction” into an enforceable, verifiable production stream with boundaries of human responsibility.

Business problem

Counsel devotes considerable time to the search, preparation and initial draft of case files and duplicates.

Solution

(c) Establishment of a workflow for the retrieval, collating of evidence and clerical support of case materials and legal information.

Technical architecture & production workflow

Step 01

SOP / History Case / Expert Interview

→

Step 02

Document Parsing, Cutting and Metadata Tags

→

Step 03

Embedding / semantic index

→

Step 04

Retrieving similar cases and rules based on current questions

→

Step 05

LLM is evidence-based advice and attachment

→

Step 06

• Rewrite the knowledge base of the new experience

Key technology & infrastructure components

Knowledge base/RAGEmbedding/vector searchPermissions and metadataLLMExpert review

Human roles & accountability

Counsel retains findings of fact, legal judgement and final issuance.

FDE delivery actions

"When will the staff come to see the teacher?"
Interviews with experts to convert tacit judgment into searchable cases and rules
Design knowledge particles, labels, versions and privileges instead of simply uploading documents
Recall rate/Application of answers using real questions
Keep feeding back feedback, wrong answers and new cases.

Reusable delivery patterns

HF, high-cost, verifiable narrow-flow selection
Steps that can be validated with a certainty tool to prevent model self-assessment
Retain manual responsibility for high-risk actions
For each manual amendment to follow-up searchable context/rules

Business outcomes & delivery results

Reduction of desk work time; disclosure of material does not have a uniform quantitative effect.

Evidence boundaries & verification notes

Public information confirming business processes; technical components are abstract architecture based on public description
The source can be directly located in the case; the value remains disclosed by the source and does not represent an independent audit.

Primary source: Datawhale FDE Case 100 | No. 3: From desk work to intelligent collaboration for litigation teams ↗ Additional sources: Datawhale FDE100 case webpage | No. 3 ↗ Additional sources: Secondary collation or aggregation source used in the old version ↗